Legal Opinion

Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. Grasso

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1933No. 9013Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The twelfth paragraph of appellee’s motion for a rehearing is as follows:

“This Court erred in holding that the portion of the Court’s charge just preceding the issue submitting the amount of damages
*340“ ‘If in response to tlie foregoing question you have answered that the defendant’s truck was operated in a negligent manner, and that such negligence, if any, caused the injury to the plaintiff, and if you have also answered that the plaintiff was not guilty of negligence contributing to the accident, then you will answer the following question; otherwise you need not…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLeanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API