Legal Opinion

Quinn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1925No. 8 Div. 240Published

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The constituent elements of the crime charged have so often been declared as to render further declaration unnecessary. See Karackalas v. State, 38 Ala. App. 181, 89 So. 833; Jordan v State, 17 Ala. App. 575, 87 So. 433; Canellos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 278, 84 So. 396. There is no sufficient evidence in this ease to prove that the property was in fact stolen, or, if so, that defendant bought it with a guilty knowledge. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and for the failure of the trial court to give this charge as requested the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Karackalas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Canellos v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Ladd v. TownsellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API