See v. Hartley

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, C.J.:

This is an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2102(b), by the defendant in a medical malpractice action from the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment. Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal to the Kansas Court of Appeals. The appeal was transferred to this court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c). We affirm the district court.

The facts are not in dispute. On September 20,1988, Scott Clayton See, the plaintiff, underwent an elective vasectomy performed by Dr. James Hartley, the defendant. On April 17, 1989,…