Legal Opinion

Continental & Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. Ricker

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 8, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit is based on a promissory note. The trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff. The amount, found to be due, according to the verdict of the jury, was forty-one thousand two hundred and forty-four dollars and fifty-eight cents ($41,244.58). After unsuccessfully moving for a new trial, appellants perfected an appeal to this court. Respondent, Continental and Commercial National Bank of Chicago, was the original payee of the note. The National Farms Estate, a common-law trust, was the maker of the note. George E. Ricker, L.C. Smith, Thomas Lynn, R.C. Healy, L.M. Vreeland and Jay M.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hagan v. Continental National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Sanders v. WeelburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Carson v. Iowa City Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. National Exchange Bank v. KilpatricSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. L.B. Foster Co. v. Glacier Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  3. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Kieselhorst Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API