Legal Opinion

Gould v. Hurley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 12, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

In his lifetime Frederick J. Anspach was the owner of eight certain lots in the borough of Spring Laké, New Jersey, and *513on May 9th, 1896, his wife joining him in the deed, he conveyed them to his daughter, C. Edith Gould, the complainant, for an expressed consideration of “one dollar and other valuable consideration.” She claims the lots as a gift from her father. She never had possession of them, nor of the deed for them. Upon the death of her father in 1905, his deed to her and a deed signed by her in blank as to a grantee, for the same premises, were found among his effects.

On…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brower v. BrowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. De Matteo v. FlaniganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Melillo v. DeVincenzoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API