Legal Opinion

State v. Nash

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 29, 1992No. 07-91-0171-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

This is a ease requiring a detailed consideration of the distinction between the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel and the constitutional prohibition against placing a defendant twice in jeopardy for the same offense, as well as the requirements for invoking the respective preclu-sions. In two points of error, the State appeals from an order dismissing, with prejudice, its complaint against appellee, David Mark Nash. The State contends that the trial court erred in its application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel in dismissing the complaint, and not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Ladner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Chandler v. Reder, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rollerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Ex Parte WatkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Guajardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Duke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API