Repass v. Estacada State Bank, Inc.

The evidence, taken as a whole, does not indicate that defendant received, in fact, $17,500, either in cash or its equivalent, for the prop*144erty in question. It is somewhere stated in the briefs that Vick valued his property in the trade at $20,000, or thereabouts, and that this valuation was accepted as the true value by defendant; but, taking the few scraps of testimony in the transcript together, we fail to find where there was any valuation suggested or accepted which would amount to more than $15,500 net. That defendant ever intended to give property of the actual value of $17,500 or…