Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2018No. S225562PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Cuéllar, J.

*3 *461 In California, mental health professionals and law enforcement personnel endeavor to identify and treat individuals likely to engage in sexually violent criminal behavior because **143 of a mental disorder. ( Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 6600 - 6609.3, SVPA or Act; see Hubbart v. Superior Court (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1138 , 1143, 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 492 , 969 P.2d 584 .) Although designation as a sexually violent predator (SVP) is not a punitive measure, individuals so designated are subject to a variety of serious consequences, including civil commitment. (§ 6604.)

Whether…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Landau v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Gladstone v. Amazon Web Services IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  3. Needham v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Needham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API