Legal Opinion

Martin v. Sentker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtLieghley, J.

The parties stood in reverse order in the court below and for convenience will be mentioned herein as they there stood.

The defendants, Isaac M. and Jacob M. Martin, were operating an amusement park known as Chester Park at the time involved in this law-suit. The plaintiff, Agnes Sentker, received some bodily injuries while a passenger on the rear car of a three-*47car train on a device known as the “Tango Dips,” commonly known as a coaster. The rear car of said train left the track while the same rounded a curve, and plaintiff was injured. Suit was brought in the court below to recover damages…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. PickleOhio Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. FettyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Orthoflex, Inc. v. ThermoTek, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Dickson v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Smith v. Price Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Fay v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API