Legal Opinion

Voirin v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

Plaintiff, an employee of defendant’s passenger, visited the steamer to bid her employer adieu, but did not find him. As she was leaving the boat, she was injured, not by a condition of the “ premises,” but by the active negligence of the defendant. In order to obtain access, plaintiff had to obtain a pass, for which she paid ten cents. I adhere to my ruling on the trial that that pass (indicating in writing defendant’s permission to plaintiff to board the ship) has nothing to do with the solution of the problem here. Where a passenger- buys transportation on a boat for a deep-sea trip, he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. . Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gulisano v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Joseph Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Joseph Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API