Legal Opinion

Lockey v. Carson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 14, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-3193Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CURTIS LOCKEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-03193 (TNM) MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER The Court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Curtis Lockey, Jr.’s complaint alleging various violations of federal law and the U.S. Constitution. See Order, ECF No. 25. Lockey now moves for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). See Pl.’s Mot. for Recons. (“Mot.”) at 3, ECF No. 27. 1 Because Lockey presents no new…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Mire v. Full Spectrum Lending Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Salazar Ex Rel. Salazar v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Handy v. Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & RothCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Leidos, Inc. v. Hellenic RepublicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API