Legal Opinion

Alameda County Social Services Agency v. A.S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2011No. A130956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J .

A.S. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders declaring her son, Miguel C. (Miguel or the minor), a dependent pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 3001 and removing him from her custody. Mother contends the removal order was “inappropriate because there was a reasonable alternative to removal that should have been considered.” *968According to mother, the court could have placed Miguel with his presumed father, A.C. (father), “without also making a removal order.”2 We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

We provide a brief procedural…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Renee J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In Re Jeannette v. MargeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Catlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alameda County Social Services Agency v. J.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. 20 In re T.M. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re A.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. In re Angelo W. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re Brandi M. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API