Alameda County Social Services Agency v. A.S.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J .
A.S. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders declaring her son, Miguel C. (Miguel or the minor), a dependent pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 3001 and removing him from her custody. Mother contends the removal order was “inappropriate because there was a reasonable alternative to removal that should have been considered.” *968According to mother, the court could have placed Miguel with his presumed father, A.C. (father), “without also making a removal order.”2 We disagree and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
We provide a brief procedural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Renee J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Jeannette v. MargeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Catlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alameda County Social Services Agency v. J.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- 20 In re T.M. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.P. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Angelo W. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Brandi M. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.