Legal Opinion

People v. Crandell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record does not support the contention of defendant that the sentencing court should have granted defendant youthful offender status, and we decline to disturb the court’s discretionary determination (see, People v Pappas, 198 AD2d 918, lv denied 82 NY2d 928). We have considered defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive and conclude that it is without merit.

We further conclude that the contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API