Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bable

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 875PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the on-the-record colloquy prior to his guilty plea was deficient because the court failed both to establish a factual basis for the plea and to explain the elements of the offense charged. 1 He also alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the plea on direct appeal from the judgment of sentence. We agree and, therefore, vacate the judgment of sentence and permit appellant to withdraw his guilty plea.

Appellant stated that on December 28, 1972, while at the home of appellant’s father, appellant and a companion consumed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. West v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. GravesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WatsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. CarboneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. CrowsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API