Legal Opinion

In Re Lofty

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2010No. 09-37271PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decision Denying Confirmation of the Debtors’ Amended Chapter 13 Plan

GUY R. HUMPHREY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

This decision concerns whether the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan of reorganization should be confirmed. For the reasons set forth below, the court determines that it should not be confirmed.

The following constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052. The findings of fact are derived from Debtor Beverly J. Lofty’s testimony at the confirmation hearing held on June 3, 2010 (the “Hearing”) and the record in this matter. In making its…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. In Re Isaac and Jacqueline Okoreeh-Baah, Metro Employees Credit Union v. Isaac and Jacqueline Okoreeh-BaahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. In Re Albert H. Caldwell, Debtor. James E. Hardin, James C. Hardin, and Ralph Majors, Cross-Appellants v. Albert H. Caldwell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. McCullough v. Brown (In Re Brown)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  5. In Re KolbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re HagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. Ruskin v. Blackshear (Blackshear)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. In re HagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
  4. In re: Darcy A. HagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. In re: Darcy A. HagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API