Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hot Stuff, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1995No. CA 93-1354Published

1ConcurrenceJohn B. Robbins, Judge

The majority of this court is of the opinion that the trial court’s finding that Benny Turner was acting within the scope of his authority was not clearly erroneous. While I concur with the majority in an affirmance, I believe that the trial court was clearly erroneous on this point.

The trial court and majority opinion appear to rely heavily on a question which Benny Turner asked Kinko’s sales employee, Tamera Harris, when he placed the $23,000 order for the August in Arkansas brochures. He asked whether there would be any problem in charging the order to “our account.” Even if the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. All American Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Arkansas Poultry Federation Insurance Trust v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. First Pentecostal Church of Jesus Christ v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API