Legal Opinion

LaConstance T. Lott v. Upgrade Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02299Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 LaConstance T. Lott, No. CV-25-02299-PHX-DMF 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Upgrade Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration 17 (“Motion to Compel”) (Doc. 21). Plaintiff LaConstance T. Lott (“Plaintiff” and/or “Lott”) 18 is a self-represented, non-incarcerated litigant (see Doc. 1-1). Plaintiff and Defendant 19 Upgrade Incorporated (“Defendant” and/or “Upgrade”) are the only parties to this matter, 20 which was removed by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API