Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Marr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Quo warranto proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The townships of "Wexford, Hanover, Springville and Antioch, in the county of Wexford, were laid off and organized as originally surveyed, containing thirty-six sections each. These townships all corner with each other. The information in this case shows that some time previous to the 28th day of May, 1879, the board of super*447visors of said county assumed to-create a new township, consisting of a section taken from each of the townships above named, all cornering with each other. The new township was called Sherman. The Legislature passed an act which was approved on the 28th day of May, 1879,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. School District No. Thirteen v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Commonwealth v. Rosenfield Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. People v. . Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Waldrop v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API