Legal Opinion
Innes v. McColgan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1941No. Civ. 2829PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment requiring defendant, as Franchise Tax Commissioner of the State of California, to pay plaintiff the sum of $107.58. This sum represented a claimed overpayment under protest of $48.82, plus $8.84 interest, on plaintiff’s income tax for 1935, and $36, plus $4.36 interest, claimed overpayment on his income tax for 1936, together with $9.56 accrued interest on those amounts.
The facts of the case are not in dispute nor are they involved. Plaintiff and Katherine D. Innes were formerly husband and wife. They had three children. Mrs. Innes was awarded an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Mosher v. MosherWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Hamilton Jewelers v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Levitt v. LevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.