Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Barney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1921No. 10142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Woods County; W. C. Crow, Judge. Action by the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against W. H. Barney and others on notes and chattel mortgage. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action upon several promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel' mortgage given to secure their payment, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below. The cause has been before this court before, coming up on the issue of conversion, which issue was decided in favor of the plaintiff in error (J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Barney et al., 54 Okla. 686, 154 Pac. 674). Upon the former trial the court, after allowing the introduction of certain testimony, struck the same from the record upon the motion of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parsons v. WrbleIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Purcell Bridge & Transfer Co. v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Barney.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hampton v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Butler v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. CardwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API