Legal Opinion

Birney v. Birney

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 14, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The original bill alleges that the complainant entrusted to the defendant, his daughter, for safekeeping, bonds and securities of the value of $63,000; that she refused to return them; that from the sale of the securities she has invested approximately $40,000 in bonds, stocks and certificates of indebtedness, which are now in the possession of the Hudson Trust Company of Hoboken. The prayer is that she account, that the trust company make discovery, and that both be enjoined pendente lite from transferring the securities, and for other relief. The daughter, a resident of California, answers,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dow v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Faber v. HoveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Rogers v. HatchNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Clark v. ChildMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Taylor v. ShewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weiss v. Metalsalts Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API