Legal Opinion
C.J. Mahan Construction Co. v. Paul Betzner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 4, 2021PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2021 Ark. 42
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-20-456 Opinion Delivered: March 4, 2021 C.J. MAHAN CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE PRAIRIE APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 59SCV-17-38] V. HONORABLE ROBERT. BYNUM PAUL BETZNER, ET AL. GIBSON, JR., JUDGE APPELLEES AFFIRMED. RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Appellants, which we collectively refer to as Mahan,1 appeal the certification of a class action against them. As a foundational argument, Mahan contends the class is not ascertainable because it is administratively unfeasible for the court to determine class membership. It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- TERIS, LLC v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Philip Morris Cos. Inc. v. MinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- FARM BUREAU POLICY HOLDERS v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- SIMPSON HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC. v. HernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Farmers Ins. Co., Inc. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael W. Gates and Susan J. Gates v. Jim Hudson, Secretary, Department of Finance and Administration of the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
- Mid-South Adjustment Co., Inc. v. Brittany Smith, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly SituatedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
- Mid-South Adjustment Co., Inc. v. Brittany Smith, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly SituatedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022