Legal Opinion

The Vigilant

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided December 21, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits by Nash Bros. & Co. and others against the steam tug Vigilant. Petition by the Title Guaranty & Surety Company to share in proceeds of vessel.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

On or about the 1st day of August, 1908, the steam tug Vigilant, being in the port of Ogdensburg and in need of repairs, requested Nash Bros. & Co., a copartnership consisting of John Hannan and Russell K. Nash, to furnish certain materials and do certain .work as machinists in making such repairs. Nash Bros. & Co. complied with the request. August 27, 1908, there was due and unpaid to Nash Bros. & Co. for same the sum of $1,891.22, and that company filed a lien on the vessel, her tackle, etc., to secure the payment of such sum, under and pursuant to the laws of the state…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re National Motorship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. Randall v. Proceeds of ScrantonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
  3. Tricontinent Shipping & Terminal Services, Inc. v. Seidle (In Re American Trading & Shipping, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API