Legal Opinion

Lightle v. Rotenberry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On January 15, 1920, W. E. Rotenberry executed and delivered to Lasswell & Goble his promisr sory note, payable to their order, .for the sum of $750. Lasswell & Coble were indebted to the Union Bank & Trust Company, of Searcy, in the sum of $700, and they deposited the Rotenberry note with the bank as collateral to their own note. Rotenberry paid the bank $100 on his note to Lasswell & Coble, and the bank indorsed a credit therefor on the Rotenberry note, and applied the payment as a credit on the Lasswell & Coble note. At some time it was agreed that the bank should take the Rotenberry note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Cox v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Martin v. HalbrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. Jennings v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  5. Liddell v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berger v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Wood v. Parker Square State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. First National Bank of Corning v. Corning Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Hollan v. American Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Sturdyvin v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API