Legal Opinion
In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 2005No. 98 Civ. 7161(VM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Lead Plaintiffs Dorian and Diane King (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a class of investors who purchased some of the $125 million in 9 3/8% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2004 (“the Notes”) issued by Livent, Inc. (“Livent”), moved for summary judgment on their claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act, 15. U.S.C. § 77k, against Garth Drabinsky (“Drabin-sky”) and Myron Gottlieb (“Gottlieb”) (collectively, “Defendants”), the sole remaining defendants in this action. By Decision and Order dated February 4, 2005 (“Decision and Order”), 1 the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford A/s/o Jt International Holdings, B v. V. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Concord Transportation, Inc., Defendant-Cross-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. FreybergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014