Legal Opinion

Comi v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1953No. [No. 128, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment and sentence of seven years and fine of $2,000 entered upon a jury’s verdict in a prosecution for conspiracy to violate the lottery laws. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged but it is contended that the court erred in a number of rulings in the course of the trial.

The indictment charged that during the period from January 1, 1950 through January 17, 1952, the appellant unlawfully conspired with Leo Quattroche, Anthony Astarita, Alexander Astarita, Thomas Murray, Washington Bragg, Norman Brown, and other persons unknown, to violate the lottery laws.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. United States v. ConfortiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. Shedlock v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Williams v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Durkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Avery v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API