Legal Opinion

Swiss Oil Corp. v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Reversing.

In January, 1917, appellee executed an oil and gas lease upon his land to appellant’s remote assignor. The lease provided that it should become void “in case no well is completed within one year,” but that the lessee could prevent “such forfeiture” by paying' stipulated rentals quarterly during the lease period and until a well was completed. No well was drilled, but rentals were regularly paid each three months.

After acceptance of the quarterly payment which fully paid the rentals to April 9, 1920, appellee, on January 7th, gave appellant written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monarch Oil, Gas & Coal Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Warren Oil & Gas Co. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Maverick Oil & Gas Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. McNutt v. Whitney & WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Bertram Developing Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawrence Oil Corporation v. MetcalfeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Pennagrade Oil & Gas Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Mid-South Oil Company v. JaynesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Warfield Natural Gas Company v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Young v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API