Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 26, 2019No. 18-1287PPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Carlos Rodriguez claims that the district court committed reversible error when it relied on previously excluded evidence to find that he violated a condition of his supervised release. He also claims that the district court had insufficient evidence to find a second violation. Concluding, as we do, that any error was harmless and that the evidence was sufficient to sustain both findings, we affirm.
We briefly rehearse the relevant facts and travel of the case. On February 10, 2011, the defendant entered a guilty plea to one count of distribution of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Richard F. Davet v. Enrico MacCaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. TsarnaevCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Garcia-CartagenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. TeixeiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.