Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Domm

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 8, 2004No. 2004-B-1194PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*967ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

hPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disci*968plinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Edward B. Domm, IV, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY AND INELIGIBILITY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1993. In 1997, he was admonished by the disciplinary board for neglecting a legal matter, failing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. In re WycheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. In Re GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In re PitreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. In Re DommSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. In Re MaderaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API