Legal Opinion
Searcy v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 6, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-0140Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HENRY SEARCY, JR., Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-140 (JMC) v. THOMAS J. VILSACK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Henry Searcy, proceeding pro se, sues U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) officials for alleged mistreatment he endured while employed at the agency. ECF 1.1 Defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF 4. Searcy has filed several motions challenging Defendants’ Westfall Act certification, ECF Nos. 9–12, as well as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.