Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Riata Cadillac Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided April 3, 1991No. 04-90-00080-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAPA, Justice.
This appeal arises from a deceptive trade practices action brought by Daniel R. Rutherford against General Motors Corporation, Cadillac Division of General Motors Corporation, and Riata Cadillac Company1 alleging fraud, misrepresentation, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability and various violations of the DTPA, allegedly arising out of Rutherford’s purchase and ownership of a used 1981 Cadillac Seville automobile. Riata counterclaimed for attorneys’ fees under § 17.50 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act. TEX.BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Donwerth v. Preston II Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Splettstosser v. MyerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Knebel v. Port Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Goodpasture, Inc. v. S & J FARMS, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Frazin v. Haynes & Boone, LLP (In Re Frazin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Arizpe v. Principal Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Rutherford v. Riata Cadillac Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- Suzanne Gasparotto, Individually and D/B/A Onion Creek Ranch v. Gallagher Power Fence, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.