Legal Opinion

Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky, Inc. v. Coal Exclusive Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 2, 2011No. Civil Action 08-80-ARTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

For the final years of her life, Glenna Booth depended on life-sustaining dialysis treatments. She received these treatments from the plaintiff healthcare provider Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky (“BMA”). BMA in turn billed Ms. Booth’s employee welfare benefit plan, Coal Exclusive Benefits (“CEB”), for the costs of those services. But CEB refused to reimburse BMA at its requested rate. BMA claims that the defendants CEB and CEB’s third-party administrator, Tim Davis & Associates, improperly refused to pay Ms. Booth’s medical…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Patricia Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zack v. Mclaren Health Advantage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Orrison v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
  3. Polonczyk v. Anthem BlueCross and BlueShieldDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API