People v. Niagara Fruit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, the Niagara Fruit Company and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 31st day of March, 1902, upon the report of a referee, for damages and costs, aiid restraining the defendants from further violation of certain specified sections of the Agricultural Law of the State of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
Spring, J.:
The appellant fruit company is a domestic corporation while the appellants Hatch and Hartman are respectively the manager and treasurer thereof. Th'e business of the fruit company is the manufacture and sale of cider vinegar with its principal office in the city *12of Rochester but with a manufacturing plant. at Tonawanda in the county of Erie. This action was commenced to "recover penalties for alleged violations of the Agricultural Law, charging the defendants with manufacturing and selling vinegar below the State standard and simulated cider vinegar for the genuine article and for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schollenberger v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Buffalo Gravel Corp. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- People ex rel. Appel v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- People v. . AbramsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People v. BishoppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- People v. WindholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.