Legal Opinion

Rumeli v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This case was decided by the court Bn Banc. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

The City of Tampa filed a bill to foreclose its tax lien upon certain realty, whereof it is alleged the appellants are the owners or have, or claim to have some interests, the nature of which is unknown but inferior to the tax lien, and prayed for relief and process against them all. Lenora T. Simms and the Dukes were served personally and appeared, and it was sought to get Rumeli in by constructive service. As the sole basis for the attempted service we find in the record the following:

“State of Florida,

County of Hillsborough.

I hereby certify that before me, the undersigned authority,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wylly v. Sanford Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Reddick v. JosephSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Mote v. MortonSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Fuller, as Admrx. Etc. v. BurrussSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Rumeli v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API