Legal Opinion

Heger v. Meissner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1954No. Docket 7; Calendar 46,129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

In this case, tried without a jury, plaintiff Gottlieb Heger sought recovery for his medical and hospital expenses, loss of earnings and the pain and suffering he sustained as a result of being struck by an automobile driven by defendant Arthur Meissner on January 28, 1953.

Heger was then employed as a night watchman by construction contractors who were erecting a building on the north side of East Warren avenue between Radnor and Canyon streets. The construction company had floodlights installed in the area which illuminated the-street to a greater extent than would have been accomplished by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malone v. ViningMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Denman v. YoungbloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ludwick v. HendricksMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Levine v. SchonbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Estate of Ava Cameron Taylor v. Darin Lee CooleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Niewiadomski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API