In the Matter of Fronse W. Smith, Jr.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Discipline Action
2Per curiam
We find that Respondent, Fronse Smith, Jr., engaged in attorney misconduct by committing the crime of intimidation. For this misconduct, a majority of the Court concludes that Respondent should be disbarred.
The matter is now before us on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission's verified disciplinary complaint. Respondent's 2013 admission to this state's bar subjects him to this Court's disciplinary jurisdiction. See IND. CONST. art. 7, § 4.
Procedural Background and Facts
The…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Matter of: R. Mark KeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- In re SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
4Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of Curtis T. Hill, Jr.Indiana Supreme Court · 2020