Skye Orthobiologics, LLC v. CTM Biomedical, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 2:20-cv-03444-MEMF-PVCx 12 SKYE ORTHOBIOLOGICS, LLC, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT BANMAN’S RENEWED 14 v. RULE 50 MOTION AND GRANTING IN PART RULE 59 MOTION [ECF NOS. 540, 15 544] 16 CTM BIOMEDICAL, LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Before the Court is a Renewed Rule 50 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [ECF No. 22 540] and Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial, to Strike/Limit Damages, or for Remittitur [ECF No. 544] 23 filed by Defendant Bryan Banman. For the reasons…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.