Legal Opinion

In Re Waters of White River

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings for the determination of the relative rights of the various claimants to the use of the water of the White river and its tributaries, a tributary of the Deschutes river. From an adverse decree, the Wapinitia Irrigation Company and its successors in interest, the Mt. Hood Land Water Company, appeal, which appeal was opposed by the Water Users Corporation of Juniper Flat, a corporation, and others.

REVERSED. REHEARING DENIED. This is an appeal by the Wapinitia Irrigation Company and the Mt. Hood Land Water Company, its successor in interest, from a decree of the circuit court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Pringle Falls Power Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Seaweard v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laramie Rivers Co. v. LevasseurWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wapinita Water Co. v. Water Users Corp. of Juniper FlatOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API