Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Major

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1927Published

1DissentCrouch, J.

I dissent because, under the evidence, the findings of negligence and freedom from contributory negligence are necessarily inconsistent.

The particular negligence alleged, proved and submitted to the jury is that defendant’s daughter pumped gasoline into the car tank with knowledge that a lighted lantern was “ contiguous to the point where this opening into the tank was — within a short distance of that.” But the same knowledge that defendant’s daughter had, or ought to have had, this plaintiff had. Defendant’s daughter stood at the gasoline pump some little ’distance away from the car with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Joyce v. BrockettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Joyce v. . BrockettNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. McGuire v. . New York Railways Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Dennis v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API