Campbell v. Russell
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The defendant has appealed from an order denying a motion for new trial. The motion was made on two grounds: Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and excessive damages given under the influence of passion or prejudice.
The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages to his crop and summer fallow. The plaintiff’s land lies adjacent and to the east of defendant’s land. The plaintiff claims the defendant ditched and drained sloughs, potholes, and low areas on his land, causing water to run onto the plaintiff’s land to his damage. The plaintiff is the owner of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Reid v. EhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Kohler v. StephensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Butler v. &198tna Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Dahl v. North American Creameries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linington v. McLean CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Linington v. McLean CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Braun v. RiskedahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Muhlhauser v. Archie Campbell Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.