Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. MacEmon v. McReynolds

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 12, 1997No. 96-0064PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the Department of Corrections may require an inmate eligible for mandatory release to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet as a condition of parole. We conclude that the department may place such a restriction on a mandatory release parolee.

Robert Macemon claims that the department is unlawfully detaining him beyond his scheduled mandatory release date. The department issued an order to hold Macemon in custody because he refused to wear a monitoring bracelet and refused to participate in postconfinement sex offender treatment. Although Macemon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bin-Rilla v. IsraelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gordie Boucher Lincoln-Mercury Madison, Inc. v. City of Madison Plan CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Eckmann v. Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KandutschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Werner v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. State Ex Rel. Riesch v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. MacEmon v. ChristieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. George v. SchwarzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API