Legal Opinion

Holman v. Hollis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 1, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, J.-

In this ease there is no dispute of facts. J. C. Holman bought certain land from one Coy Hollis. Coy Hollis owed E. H. Hollis $2,500.00, the interest on which had been paid to November 1, 1925. As a part of the consideration for the land J. C. Holman and Y. J. Holman on July 28, 1925, assumed the indebtedness from Coy Hollis to- E. H. Hollis and thereupon made and executed five certain promissory notes, as follows:

“1 note for $700, due Nov. 1, 1926;

1 note for $660, due Nov. 1, 1927;

1 note for $620, due Nov. 1, 1928;

1 note for $580, due Nov. 1, 1929;

1‘note for-$540, due Nov; 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. FittsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Tidwell v. WittmeierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Read v. Flaketown Graphite Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Baader v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Turner v. State Ex Rel. GruverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. In Re Mill City Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API