Bevill v. City of Quitman, Texas
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TERRY BEVILL, § § Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-406 § Judge Mazzant CITY OF QUITMAN, TEXAS, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. #347) and Bill of Costs (Dkt. #344). Having considered the Motions, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. #347) should be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs (Dkt. #344) should be GRANTED in part and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pacheco v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.