Legal Opinion

Bevill v. City of Quitman, Texas

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 2025No. 4:19-cv-00406Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TERRY BEVILL, § § Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-406 § Judge Mazzant CITY OF QUITMAN, TEXAS, et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. #347) and Bill of Costs (Dkt. #344). Having considered the Motions, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. #347) should be GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs (Dkt. #344) should be GRANTED in part and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pacheco v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API