Legal Opinion

The Mozart Company, a Corporation v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-1733, 86-2156PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Mozart Co. (Mozart), an auto parts distributor and manufacturer, alleged various antitrust violations by Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (MBNA), arising out of MBNA’s franchise agreements with its dealerships. The agreements required each franchisee to deal exclusively in replacement parts supplied by MBNA. Following an eleven-week jury trial, the jury rendered a special verdict, finding that, although MBNA had violated the Sherman Act by way of a tying arrangement, there was a business justification for the conduct. The district court entered judgment for MBNA…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API