Legal Opinion

Capital City Lumber Co. v. Schroeder

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

It is well established that a conveyance of real estate, at a time when work thereon is in progress, or when the premises are subject to a lienable claim, which is thereafter perfected during the time limited by statute, does not affect the right of a materialman to a lien for materials theretofore furnished. Rockel, Mechanics’ Liens, p. 392, § 150; Hewett v. Currier, 63 Wis. 386, 23 N. W. 884; Crocker v. Currier, 65 Wis. 662, 27 N. W. 825; Hutchins v. Bautch, 123 Wis. 394, 101 N. W. 671; Reynolds v. Manhattan Trust Co. 83 Fed. 593.

That the plaintiff’s right to claim a lien for materials…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hewett v. CurrierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Evans-Lee Co. v. HotonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Crocker v. CurrierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Reynolds v. Manhattan Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  5. Hutchins v. BautchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duitman v. LiebeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Findorff v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wes Podany Const. Co., Inc. v. NowickiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API