Legal Opinion

United States v. Connors

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 5, 1924No. 2313-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

REED, District Judge,

Taking up the motion for a new trial, I find it to be based on two grounds, namely, first, the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict rendered, and that the verdict is against the law; and, second, errors of láw occurring at the trial and excepted to by the United States, because the court erred in refusing- to instruct a verdict in favor of the United States.

As to the first ground alleged, the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict against the United States, as I remember the contention made by the United States attorney, it is claimed on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Caldwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Tracey v. . CorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API