United States v. Connors
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge,
Taking up the motion for a new trial, I find it to be based on two grounds, namely, first, the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict rendered, and that the verdict is against the law; and, second, errors of láw occurring at the trial and excepted to by the United States, because the court erred in refusing- to instruct a verdict in favor of the United States.
As to the first ground alleged, the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict against the United States, as I remember the contention made by the United States attorney, it is claimed on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Caldwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Tracey v. . CorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.