Legal Opinion

Darnall v. City of Monticello

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 21, 1988No. 4-87-0723PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

Plaintiffs Robert Damall and Nancy Damall filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against defendant the city of Monticello in the circuit court of Piatt County. Plaintiffs had sought a conditional use permit to build a duplex on property which they owned in an area of Monticello which was zoned for single-family houses. The permit was denied by the city planning commission and the city council. The declaratory judgment action asked that defendant’s zoning ordinance be declared void and unenforceable against plaintiffs’ property. After a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People Ex Rel. Stamos v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Moehle v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Duggan v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tomaso v. Plum Grove BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Yates v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Suhadolnik v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Smith v. Intergovernmental Solid Waste Disposal Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Estate of Zander v. Illinois Dept. of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API