Legal Opinion

United States v. Della Porta

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2011No. 10-50168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

In United States v. Evanston, we recently held that a district court abuses its discretion and impermissibly coerces a jury verdict where, “over defense objection and after the administration of an unsuccessful Allen charge, [the court] inquire[s] into the reasons for a trial jury’s deadlock and then permit[s] supplemental argument focused on those issues, where the issues in dispute are factual rather than legal.” 651 F.3d 1080, 1082 (9th Cir.2011). In this case we also address the use of supplemental closing arguments to assist a deadlocked jury, but under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert SproatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Mark EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Castellanos v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  4. United States v. Rafael Jimenez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API