Legal Opinion

Wisdom & Levy v. Bille

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 9, 1908No. 16,857Published

Action by Wisdom & Levy against W. H. Bille and Waldemar Bille. From a judgment in the city court for defendants, plaintiffs appealed to the Court' of Appeal, in which court there was a judgment for plaintiffs, and Waldemar Bille petitions for cer-tiorari or a writ of review to the Court of Appeal, which writ Wisdom & Levy moved to dismiss. Motion to dismiss denied.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

The defendant, Dr. Waldemar Bille, was sued as indorser on the several promissory notes sued on and involved in this litigation. In the different petitions of the plaintiffs it is not alleged that notice of dishonor of said notes and protest of said notes had been given him. Plaintiffs contended and still contend that the allegations therein contained that the notes had been “duly protested” was sufficient to enable them to prove notice of dishonor. The judge of division C was not of that opinion, and nonsuited the plaintiffs in each of the three cases before him. On appeal to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wall v. BrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
  2. Ball v. GreaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  3. Bird v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API