Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 3, 2018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 183 Conn.App. 623, 193 A.3d 585 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the trial court's denial of the motion to preclude the state's late disclosed expert witness and related motion for continuance was not an abuse of discretion and, even if an abuse of discretion, was not harmful error?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's exclusion of William Smith's testimony?
"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. Quint v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. State v. NjokuConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. State v. PorfilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API